
The best PeopleDataLabs alternatives in 2026 are Apollo.io, ZoomInfo, Lusha, Coresignal, and Enricher.io, each offering different strengths for B2B data enrichment. According to G2's 2026 market analysis, organizations are increasingly seeking PDL alternatives due to concerns about data freshness (PDL updates monthly vs. competitors offering real-time enrichment) and pricing transparency. This guide compares 10 tested alternatives based on data accuracy, pricing, and specific use cases.

PeopleDataLabs offers API-first access to 2.5 billion+ person profiles, but several limitations drive businesses to explore alternatives. According to Nubela's comparison research, PDL's monthly data refresh cycle means some records become stale between updates—a critical issue when B2B contact data decays at 2.1% monthly.
I've worked with data enrichment platforms for over eight years at Enricher.io, testing dozens of providers for accuracy, coverage, and value. The alternatives I'm recommending here address specific gaps in PDL's offering: real-time enrichment, transparent pricing, and specialized use cases.
Key reasons businesses switch from PeopleDataLabs:
| Platform | Best For | Starting Price | Database Size | Data Refresh |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apollo.io | Mid-market sales teams | Free tier / $49/mo | 275M+ contacts | Real-time |
| ZoomInfo | Enterprise Fortune 1000 | $15,000+/year | 600M+ profiles | Continuous |
| Lusha | SMB prospecting | Free tier / $32/mo | 100M+ contacts | Real-time |
| Coresignal | Company data & job postings | Custom pricing | 495M+ job postings | Weekly |
| Clearbit (HubSpot) | HubSpot users | HubSpot bundled | 200M+ contacts | Real-time |
| Enricher.io | Email-to-profile enrichment | $0.01/record | 2.5B+ profiles | Real-time |
| FullEnrich | Waterfall enrichment | $29/mo | 20+ sources | Real-time |
| Proxycurl | Developer API access | $10/mo | LinkedIn profiles | On-demand |
| UpLead | SMB lead generation | $99/mo | 155M+ contacts | Real-time verified |
| Lead411 | Intent data + contacts | $99/mo | 450M+ contacts | Continuous |
Based on extensive testing across accuracy, pricing, and specific use cases, here are the top 10 PeopleDataLabs alternatives for 2026:
Apollo.io combines data enrichment with a complete sales engagement platform, making it the most practical PDL alternative for teams that need both prospecting data and outreach tools in one system.
| Quick Facts | Details |
|---|---|
| Best For | Mid-market sales teams (100-1000 employees) |
| Database Size | 275M+ contacts, 73M+ companies |
| Starting Price | Free (limited) / $49/user/month |
| Cost per Contact | $0.47 average (verified) |
| Standout Feature | Built-in email sequencing |
| G2 Rating | 4.8/5 (7,400+ reviews) |
In my testing, Apollo excelled at finding contacts in the 100-1000 employee company range—according to CleanList's 2026 comparison, Apollo had 31% unique coverage in this segment that competitors couldn't match.
Key Features:
Pros:
Cons:
Who Should Use Apollo: Sales teams at mid-market companies who need combined prospecting and outreach capabilities without managing multiple tools.
ZoomInfo remains the enterprise standard for B2B intelligence, offering the largest database and most comprehensive intent data—but at a significant price point that limits it to well-funded teams.
| Quick Facts | Details |
|---|---|
| Best For | Enterprise Fortune 1000 targeting |
| Database Size | 600M+ professional profiles, 135M+ companies |
| Starting Price | $15,000+/year (annual contracts) |
| Cost per Contact | $0.62 average (verified) |
| Standout Feature | Buyer intent data integration |
| G2 Rating | 4.4/5 (8,500+ reviews) |
According to Cognism's competitive analysis, ZoomInfo dominated Fortune 1000 contact coverage with 23% unique data that competitors couldn't replicate. If your ICP includes large enterprises, ZoomInfo's depth is unmatched.
Key Features:
Pros:
Cons:
Who Should Use ZoomInfo: Enterprise sales organizations with $15K+ annual budgets targeting Fortune 1000 accounts who need the deepest possible company intelligence.
Lusha offers the most accessible entry point for small businesses needing contact enrichment, with a generous free tier and straightforward per-contact pricing.
| Quick Facts | Details |
|---|---|
| Best For | SMBs and individual sales reps |
| Database Size | 100M+ business contacts |
| Starting Price | Free (5 credits/mo) / $32/user/month |
| Pro Plan | 1,920 emails + 480 phones/month |
| Standout Feature | Browser extension simplicity |
| G2 Rating | 4.3/5 (1,500+ reviews) |
Lusha's strength is accessibility. According to their own analysis of the market, 60% of their users are individual contributors or small teams who can't justify enterprise platform costs.
Key Features:
Pros:
Cons:
Who Should Use Lusha: Individual sales reps, recruiters, and small teams who need simple contact enrichment without enterprise complexity.
Coresignal differentiates from PeopleDataLabs by focusing on company-level data and maintaining the largest job posting database—495M+ records that reveal hiring trends, company growth, and market movements.
| Quick Facts | Details |
|---|---|
| Best For | Investors, recruiters, market researchers |
| Database Size | 95M+ companies, 495M+ job postings |
| Starting Price | Custom (API-based) |
| Data Formats | JSON, CSV, Parquet |
| Standout Feature | Job posting intelligence |
| G2 Rating | 4.5/5 (50+ reviews) |
According to Coresignal's direct comparison, they offer more company profiles than PDL, while PDL has more individual employee records. The choice depends on whether you prioritize person-level or company-level intelligence.
Key Features:
Pros:
Cons:
Who Should Use Coresignal: Investment firms, market researchers, and recruiters who need company-level intelligence and hiring trend data.
Clearbit was acquired by HubSpot in 2023 and is now tightly integrated into the HubSpot ecosystem. According to FullEnrich's analysis, the standalone Clearbit free plan was discontinued in 2025—making it exclusively valuable for HubSpot customers.
| Quick Facts | Details |
|---|---|
| Best For | HubSpot ecosystem users |
| Database Size | 200M+ contacts, 50M+ companies |
| Starting Price | Bundled with HubSpot plans |
| Cost per Contact | $0.71 average (when standalone) |
| Standout Feature | Real-time form enrichment |
| G2 Rating | 4.4/5 (600+ reviews) |
Key Features:
Pros:
Cons:
Who Should Use Clearbit: Companies already using HubSpot who want native enrichment for inbound leads and form fills.
Enricher.io (our platform) specializes in transforming email addresses into complete professional profiles, offering the most affordable per-record pricing in the market.
| Quick Facts | Details |
|---|---|
| Best For | Email list enrichment at scale |
| Database Size | 2.5B+ person profiles |
| Starting Price | $0.01/record (pay-as-you-go) |
| Enrichment Attributes | 26+ data points per profile |
| Standout Feature | Bulk CSV enrichment |
| G2 Rating | 4.6/5 (100+ reviews) |
Key Features:
Pros:
Cons:
Who Should Use Enricher.io: Marketing teams with existing email lists who need affordable, high-volume enrichment without enterprise complexity.
FullEnrich aggregates data from 20+ sources using waterfall enrichment—checking multiple providers sequentially to maximize match rates and data coverage.
| Quick Facts | Details |
|---|---|
| Best For | Maximum data coverage across sources |
| Data Sources | 20+ enrichment providers |
| Starting Price | $29/month |
| Credit Rollover | Up to 3 months |
| Standout Feature | Multi-source waterfall |
| Capterra Rating | 4.7/5 |
According to FullEnrich's methodology, their waterfall approach achieves 40-60% higher match rates than single-source providers by cascading through multiple data sources until finding a match.
Key Features:
Pros:
Cons:
Who Should Use FullEnrich: Teams who need maximum match rates and are willing to trade speed for coverage.
Proxycurl provides developer-focused APIs for scraping and enriching LinkedIn profiles on-demand, offering fresh data with flexible endpoint options.
| Quick Facts | Details |
|---|---|
| Best For | Developers building custom solutions |
| Data Source | LinkedIn profiles (scraped) |
| Starting Price | $10/month (100 credits) |
| Data Freshness | On-demand scraping |
| Standout Feature | Fresh vs. cached data options |
| G2 Rating | 4.8/5 (20+ reviews) |
According to Scrapin's analysis, Proxycurl differentiates by offering flexibility between freshly-scraped data, data 29 days old, or historical records—letting users optimize for freshness vs. cost.
Key Features:
Pros:
Cons:
Who Should Use Proxycurl: Development teams building custom enrichment workflows who need fresh LinkedIn data and API flexibility.
UpLead emphasizes real-time email verification, only charging for verified contacts—eliminating wasted credits on bounced emails.
| Quick Facts | Details |
|---|---|
| Best For | Quality-focused prospecting |
| Database Size | 155M+ contacts, 200+ countries |
| Starting Price | $99/month (170 credits) |
| Verification | Real-time, only pay for verified |
| Standout Feature | 95% data accuracy guarantee |
| G2 Rating | 4.7/5 (750+ reviews) |
Key Features:
Pros:
Cons:
Who Should Use UpLead: Teams prioritizing data quality over quantity who want to eliminate bounced emails and wasted outreach.
Lead411 combines contact enrichment with intent signals, helping teams identify not just who to contact but when they're most likely to buy.
| Quick Facts | Details |
|---|---|
| Best For | Timing-focused outreach |
| Database Size | 450M+ contacts |
| Starting Price | $99/month |
| Intent Signals | Hiring, funding, news triggers |
| Standout Feature | Growth intent triggers |
| G2 Rating | 4.5/5 (450+ reviews) |
Key Features:
Pros:
Cons:
Who Should Use Lead411: Sales teams who want to time their outreach based on buying signals like new funding or executive hires.
The best alternative depends on your specific use case, budget, and existing tech stack. Use this decision framework:
| If You Need... | Choose... | Why |
|---|---|---|
| All-in-one sales platform | Apollo.io | Combined data + outreach tools |
| Enterprise-grade intelligence | ZoomInfo | Deepest Fortune 1000 coverage |
| Simple, affordable prospecting | Lusha | Easiest learning curve, free tier |
| Company/hiring intelligence | Coresignal | Largest job posting database |
| HubSpot integration | Clearbit | Native HubSpot enrichment |
| Affordable bulk enrichment | Enricher.io | Lowest per-record pricing |
| Maximum match rates | FullEnrich | 20+ source waterfall |
| Fresh LinkedIn data | Proxycurl | On-demand scraping |
| Verified-only contacts | UpLead | 95% accuracy guarantee |
| Intent + timing signals | Lead411 | Bombora intent integration |
For comparison, PeopleDataLabs offers tiered pricing:
| PDL Plan | Price | Included |
|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 | 1,000 API calls/month, basic access |
| Pro | $98/month | 10,000 API calls/month, full access |
| Enterprise | Custom | Unlimited calls, dedicated support |
PDL's API-first approach works well for developers but requires technical resources. Most alternatives offer more accessible interfaces for non-technical users.
Ready to enrich your B2B data? Enricher.io provides data enrichment starting at $0.01/record with no minimum commitment—try it free to compare against PeopleDataLabs.
PeopleDataLabs is a B2B data provider offering API access to 2.5 billion+ person profiles for data enrichment, lead generation, and market research. Companies use PDL to append professional information to existing records or build prospect lists.
PeopleDataLabs offers a free tier with 1,000 API calls/month, a Pro plan at $98/month with 10,000 calls, and custom Enterprise pricing for high-volume users. The API-first model requires development resources to implement.
No, Clearbit was acquired by HubSpot in 2023 and the standalone free plan was discontinued in 2025. Clearbit features are now bundled into HubSpot subscriptions, making it impractical for non-HubSpot users.
Enricher.io offers the lowest per-record pricing at $0.01/record with no minimum commitment. For all-in-one platforms, Apollo.io's free tier provides 600 email credits monthly, and Lusha offers 5 free credits per month.
UpLead claims 95% data accuracy with real-time verification—you only pay for verified contacts. ZoomInfo and Apollo also rank highly for accuracy, though verification methods vary by provider.
